Results of the RMBS Contest 2005

held in Copper Mountain, CO

RMBS Contest 2005 Winners Photo

Students Contest

Written Contest (22 BS/MS, 3 Doc, 25 Total)
Best Paper

Shakya Kabita
Institute of Technology Blanchardstown - Ireland

Second Place

Lukas Saylan J.
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Third Place

Wang Xue
University of Kentucky

Presentation Contest (16 BS/MS, 3 Doc, 19 Total)
First Place

Brooks Amanda
University of Wyoming

Second Place

Ellingson Benjamin
Medical College of Wisconsin

Third Place

Harman William
University of Wyoming

Poster Contest (6 BS/MS, 0 Doc, 6 Total)
First Place

Madsen Robert
University of Wyoming

Second Place

Martin Tina
University of Mississippi

Third Place

Geu Matthew
University of Wyoming

Special Awards
President's Award

Sathe Chaitanya
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Conference Chairman's Award

Giardini S. K.
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Contest Committee's Award

Braund Matt
USAFA

Anthony Sances Jr. Award of Merit

Franklin Laura
University of Mississippi

25 students participated in the contest.

Following the guidelines approved in the 2002 RMBS board fall meeting, since only three papers were in the Doctoral category (one short of the requirement to have separate category), this year the Contest was run with unified categories. Each paper was review by four judges. 15 judges expressed their preferences in the written competition and each judge reviewed at least three papers. For each judge the scores were normalized. The total score for the paper was average of the four normalized scores.

At the symposium, 19 presentations and six posters were judged.

Nine judges expressed their preferences in the presentation competition. Not all students were evaluated by the same judges and not all of them received the same number of votes, but each presentation was judged by at least two judges. The scores were again normalized for each judge and the total score for each presentation was the average of the single scores.

Six judges expressed their preferences in the poster competition. Not all students were evaluated by the same judges and not all of them received the same number of votes, but each poster was judged by at least five judges. As for the presentations, the scores were normalized for each judge and the total score for each poster was the average of the single scores.

For the special awards, seven judges were involved: the president, one past president, both conference program chairmen, one member of the student paper contest committee and two judges in charge of selecting the winner of the Anthony Sances Jr. Award of Merit. Each one of the judges subjectively selected and ranked up to 5 students as the possible winners of the respective award. Following the guidelines, each special award was given to the higher-ranking student that did not yet win any other award.