Results of the RMBS Contest 2007

held in Denver, CO

RMBS Contest 2007 Winners Photo

Students Contest

Written Contest
Best Paper

Eric Kennedy
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest, Center for Injury Biomechanics

Second Place

Scott Wingerter
University of Mississippi Medical Center

Third Place

Miguel Alonso Jr.
Florida International University

Presentation Contest
First Place

F. Scott Gayzik
Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Second Place

Sarah Manoogian
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest Center for Injury Biomechanics

Third Place

Andrew Kemper
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest Center for Injury Biomechanics

Poster Contest
First Place

Yue Zhao
School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University

Second Place

Sarah Manoogian
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest Center for Injury Biomechanics

Third Place

Felisa Wilson
University of Mississippi Medical Center

Special Awards
President's Award

Kerry Danelson
Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Program Chairman's Award

Steve Rowson
Virginia Tech

Contest Chairman's Award

Benjamin M Ellingson
Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University

Anthony Sances Jr. Award of Merit

Douglas Gabauer
Virginia Tech

34 students participated in the contest, with 3 students submitting two papers. The same guidelines were applied this year to the review of all the papers; each paper was reviewed by at least two judges. When the scores of the two judges were more than 1 point apart, a third judge reviewed the paper. 24 judges expressed their preferences in the written competition and each judge reviewed at least five papers, as part of the review process of all the papers submitted for the 2007 symposium.

At the symposium, 23 presentations and 14 posters were judged. 15 judges expressed their preferences in the presentation competition. Not all students were evaluated by the same judges and not all of them received the same number of votes, but each presentation was judged by at least eight judges. The scores were again normalized for each judge and the total score for each presentation was the average of the normalized scores.

Four judges expressed their preferences in the poster competition. As for the presentations, the scores were normalized for each judge and the total score for each poster was the average of the normalized scores.

For the special awards, four judges were involved. Each judge subjectively selected and ranked up to 5 students as the possible winners of a special award. Following the guidelines, each special award was given to the highest-ranking student that did not yet win any other award.