Results of the RMBS Contest 2011

held in Denver, CO

Students Contest

Written Contest
Best Paper

David A. Black
University of Mississippi Medical Center

Second Place

Brian K. Dean
University of Wyoming

Third Place

Spencer J. Fox
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Presentation Contest
First Place

David A. Black
University of Mississippi Medical Center

Second Place

Ashley A. Weaver
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University Center for Injury Biomechanics

Third Place

Emily Dosmar
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Poster Contest
First Place

Kathryn L. Loftis
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University Center for Injury Biomechanics

Second Place

Nathan D. Otten
University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Third Place

Erin C.Wiggers
University of Mississippi Medical Center

Special Awards
President's Award

Henry O. Owegi
Indiana State University

Program Chairman's Award

Katie J. Trella
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Contest Chairman's Award

Robert W. Streeter
University of Wyoming

Anthony Sances Jr. Award of Merit

Sherry N. Davidoff
University of Utah

25 students participated in the contest, with one student presenting two papers.

For the written competition, all the papers were reviewed as part of the paper acceptance process: each paper was reviewed by 2 judges. 18 judges expressed their preferences in the written competition and each judge reviewed at least 4 papers. The written scores were normalized for each judge and the total score for each paper was the average of the normalized scores.

At the symposium, 18 presentations and 6 posters were judged (two students did not present their paper, so they were not included in the judging).

17 judges expressed their preferences in the presentation competition. Not all students were evaluated by the same judges and not all of them received the same number of votes, but each presentation was judged by at least 13 judges. The scores were again normalized for each judge and the total score for each presentation was the average of the normalized scores.

4 judges expressed their preferences in the poster competition. As for the presentations, the scores were normalized for each judge and the total score for each poster was the average of the normalized scores.

For the special awards, 4 judges were involved. Each judge subjectively selected and ranked up to 5 students as the possible winners of their special award.

Professionals Contest

Best Paper

Junichi Iwamoto
School of Medical Technology, Sanyo Women's College - Hiroshima

Oral Award

David C. Paulus
University of Arkansas - Ft. Smith

6 professionals participated in the contest.

For the written competition, the same criteria as the student's written competitions applied.

At the symposium, 2 presentations and 4 posters were judged. Six students expressed their preferences in the professional competition. Not all professionals were evaluated by the same students and not all of them received the same number of votes, but each professional was judged by at least 2 students. The scores were again normalized for each student and the total score for each professional was the average of the normalized scores. Since the number of professionals participating in the contest was very small, the presentation and poster awards were combined in one oral award.