Results of the RMBS Contest 2012

held in Blacksburg, VA

Students Contest

Written Contest
Best Paper

Meghan Howes
Virginia Tech

Second Place

Emma Moran
VT-WFU SBES

Third Place

Arun Kailasan
University of Virginia

Presentation Contest
First Place

Tracye Lawyer
University of Mississippi Medical Center

Second Place

Angelia Garner
University of Mississippi Medical Center

Third Place

Jillian Urban
Wake Forest University

Poster Contest
First Place

Elizabeth Fievesohn
VT-WFU SBES

Second Place

Thomas Ruscher
Virginia Tech

Third Place

Christina Seimetz
Virginia Tech

Special Awards
President's Award

Matthew Dowden
Virginia Tech

Program Chairman's Award

Karen Joyce
Wake Forest University

Contest Chairman's Award

Nick Johnson
VT-WFU SBES

Anthony Sances Jr. Award of Merit

Vanessa Alphonse
Virginia Tech

11 professionals participated in the contest, with one professional presenting two papers. For the written competition, the same criteria as the student's written competitions applied.

At the symposium, 6 presentations and 4 posters were judged (two professionals could not attend the conference and were excluded from the competition and one professional presented two posters). 4 students expressed their preferences in the professional presentation competition and 3 in the professional poster competition. The scores were again normalized for each student and the total score for each professional was the average of the normalized scores.

Professionals Contest

Best Paper

Alex Iwaskiw
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

Best Presentation

Alexis Wickwire
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

Best Poster

Sri Kumar
RMBS

8 professionals participated in the contest. For the written competition, the same criteria as the student's written competitions applied.

At the symposium, 5 presentations and 2 posters were judged. Four students expressed their preferences in the professional competition. Not all professionals were evaluated by the same students and not all of them received the same number of votes, but each professional was judged by at least 2 students. The scores were again normalized for each judge and the total score for each professional was the average of the normalized scores. Since the number of professionals participating in the contest was very small, the presentation and poster awards were combined in one oral award.